The phrase "knowledge of linguistics" is grammatically correct and is commonly used in written English.
It can be used when talking about someone's understanding or expertise in the field of linguistics. For example: - Her extensive knowledge of linguistics helped her excel in her language study program. - The job requirements include a deep understanding and practical knowledge of linguistics. - I have always been interested in languages and have acquired a good amount of knowledge of linguistics through my studies.
He draws on research and his deep knowledge of linguistics to give his writing principles a scientific basis.
"The Riddle of the Labyrinth," a gripping and tightly focused scholarly mystery informed by the author's own knowledge of linguistics, recounts the story of Linear B through three people who fell under its spell.
Seán Cormac Nottingham I took A-level Greek at Camden last year, and the discipline it requires has proved invaluable, and I believe that much of my academic success has been due to the in-depth knowledge of linguistics, history, culture and language it provided.
While SkyPhrase is beginning with football and Google Analytics (because that's where they wanted help), the CEO thinks the startup's tech can make it easy for developers with "little knowledge of linguistics or artificial intelligence to create natural language interfaces for their own data and applications".
It is a matter of linguistics.
The narrator is Skanda, son of linguistics professor Toby Ketu.
Much of the problem is a matter of linguistics.
Professor of linguistics emerita, University of California, Berkeley.
Though feminism was her springboard, her artistic investigations reveal a deep knowledge of psychoanalysis, linguistics, literature (especially Gertrude Stein, Virginia Woolf, Antonin Artaud and Samuel Beckett) and the history of art, expressed in a dizzying collection of work in many mediums.
(Note: I'm assuming it's made up, but I apologize if I am underselling Ellis's first-hand knowledge of entomological linguistics.) At first it's pure silliness as readers try to wrap their tongues around these bizarre syllables (my son literally fell out of the bed laughing the first time we read it together).
But when an "expert" like Leonard tells a jury with little knowledge of science or linguistics that the language in one sample is consistent with the language in another, the prejudicial effect far outweighs any probative value that the observation might have in identifying the murderer.
