Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Scientific knowledge is founded on empirical evidence yielded by observations or controlled experiments (question 3).
Stated more explicitly, Dingle here argues that authentic science is empiricist in epistemology (scientific knowledge is founded in sensory observation), and inductivist in method (general principles are reached via inductive logic).
Contextual knowledge is founded on recognized and applied uniqueness of the time-spatial settings of the particular biogas plant and its operation, for example, concerning which kind of recommended energy crops and cropping system should be implemented at a height of 850 m above sea level.
Obviously, Dingle is here arguing against the view, Milne's view, that authentic science may be rationalist in epistemology (scientific knowledge is founded in pure theoretical reasoning apart from sense perception), and hypothetico-deductive in method (general principles are justified by their deductively implying correct observations).
That is, although we naturally speak of perceptions as being of objects and in or by the mind, on the view that all knowledge is founded on perception and that in perception we are immediately acquainted with nothing but perceptions, it becomes problematic how we could have knowledge either of the mind itself or of any object of perceptions distinct from those perceptions.
Euler insisted that knowledge is founded in part on the basis of precise quantitative laws, something that monadism and Wolffian science were unable to provide.
Similar(6)
This fits into his description, in DOS 429, of scientific knowledge being founded upon three kinds things: things that have actual being; things that have potential being; things that have aptitudinal being, that is, incomplete potency.
In the semantic web context, knowledge discovery is founded on the use of the standards (e.g. RDFS and OWL) and the exploration of available linked data resources at a web-scale [ 11].
That is, by the last third of the 18th century natural philosophy has an authoritative claim to knowledge even if it is founded on very uncommon, "abstruse" principles.
It is never irrational, as it is founded on the knowledge of the truth of the Logos, but all knowledge proceeds from faith, as first principles are unprovable outside a systematic structure.
This is important since a reliable foresight is founded on reliable knowledge about the present.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com