Results contribute to the existing literature on environmental knowledge, arguing that discourses on water scarcity are not objective but shaped by socio-political contingencies.
Swartz engaged in an act of civil disobedience to liberate that knowledge, arguing that "there is no justice in following unjust laws.
In On Certainty, Wittgenstein contrasted the concepts of certainty and knowledge, arguing that certainty is not a "surer" form of knowledge but the necessary backdrop against which the "language games" of knowing, doubting, and inquiring take place.
Ernest Sosa has advanced an important approach to knowledge and skepticism based on a "safety" condition for knowledge, arguing that his approach is superior both to accounts that instead stress the importance of "sensitivity" to knowledge, and to contextualist solutions to skepticism.
For example, in 1850, Thomas Milner-Gibson, president of the Association for the Repeal of the Taxes on Knowledge, argued that repeal would "give to men of capital and respectability the power of gaining access by newspapers, by faithful record of the facts, to the minds of the working classes".
Van Dijk (2014: 171) insists on a relativist view on knowledge, arguing that "knowledge in everyday life only functions by the criteria of a community".
Second, in "Literature and Truth," he examines the relationship of literature and knowledge, arguing that works of philosophical fiction provide knowledge not only in the form of assertions but also through suggestions, implications, and contemplations.
Aloni and Égré (2010) offer a different take on Schaffer's Problem of Convergent Knowledge, arguing that it reveals a pragmatic ambiguity concerning what it means to know the answer to a wh-question.
Knowledge of these consequences must be based on experience Swinburne rejected the idea that God could implant such knowledge, arguing that humans would question its reliability.
