Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In addition, though the scores of the two algorithms are with different standards, it can be seen that gngm ASSOCIATED_WITH ranks first and has a KM score of 0.036137 which is much higher than the others.
Similar(56)
The F-score of KM (40.37%) is better than that of the Combo method (35.77%).
All regularly ran distances greater than 5 km and VISA-A scores indicated good tendon function (T1DM = 94 ± 11, control = 94 ± 10).
At 3 Km for instance, accessibility scores range from 0.014 to.530 clinics per 1,000 inhabitants for the conventional model and from.057 to 4.435 physicians per 1,000 potential clients for the optimized model.
The predictor of the slowdown at 4 km is the high Hazard Score in the 3 4 km interval, which reflects larger homeostatic disturbances.
Out of point distance measures, <3 <span class="lh">km had the highest TSS score (Aberdeenshire range 0.686-0.712; Ayrangee range 0.662-0.680).
There were trivial differences between men and women in age (p = 0.07), training history (p = 0.23), and personal bests at racing distances between 1 mile and 10 km as represented by IAAF scores [37] (p = 0.82).
KM and UM assessed and scored CT scans and drafted parts of the paper.
The KM method achieves an F-score of 61%, which is better than that of the Combo method (57%).
KM carried out the HRCT scoring, NT carried out the Bronchoalveolar Lavage, KP and NK carried out the DTPA scans.
These classes were added together for each 1 km square to provide a single score to develop an expert system to define HNV.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com