Sentence examples for kits as compared from inspiring English sources

Several studies assessed the effect on screening participation of in-home, mailed, vaginal self-sampling kits as compared with recall letters (Table 5; Bais et al, 2007; Gök et al, 2010; Tamalet et al, 2010; Giorgi Rossi et al, 2011; Szarewski et al, 2011; Wikström et al, 2011; Virtanen et al, 2011a, 2011b; Gök et al, 2012; Sancho-Garnier et al, 2013; Darlin et al, 2013b; Broberg et al, 2014).

The protein separation was enhanced, protein loss was minimized, and desalting efficiency was improved with the 2D-clean up kit as compared to the single buffer exchange method.

Supporting this notion, Ras cells treated with cytarabine were much less likely to express the stem cell marker kit as compared to control cells (Figure 5C).

In parallel patients with severe asthma had decreased level of serum soluble c-kit as compared to non-severe asthmatics.

However, there was a trend toward higher use in the facilitation group for one of the components of the kit as compared to those who received the kit by courier or standard mail.

In 1998, Sarlomo-Rikala et al. [8] noted that GISTs stained nearly universally positive for CD117 (Kit) as compared to other mesenchymal tumors such as leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, and schwannoma.

Our observations in line with study in patients with atopic dermatitis [ 8] which showed higher serum levels of both SCF and sc-kit as compared to control subjects and positive correlation of sc-kit levels with atopic dermatitis severity index SCORAD.

In addition, the exposure of 0.1 μM AUY922 for 24 h was able to sustainably reduce the levels of total and phospho-KIT as compared with the effect of 1 μM 17-AAG in GIST48 cells, as shown in Figure 1F.

We could observe a significant higher immunohistochemical expression of c-KIT in mucosal melanomas that harbour a potentially activating KIT mutation as compared with tumours without KIT mutation.

Strikingly, inhibition of EpoR signaling in AG490-treated cells was accompanied by an increase in Kit expression as compared to untreated cells.

This was also the situation when testing cattle, where the BoHV-1 gB kits was found more suitable as compared to kits with an indirect ELISA design [ 14, 24- 26].