Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
With regard to effectiveness, the professionals involved in the analysis declared a final average score of 4.13 for the innovative kit compared with 3.56 for the reusable one (p-value = 0.035).
Therefore, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR kit compared with blood culture method were 99.6% and 89.5%, respectively.
The analytical sensitivity of the kit also showed no loss of sensitivity of the FTD STD9 kit compared with singleplex assays as reported in the manufacturer validation document.
The sensitivity of the rapid test kit compared with RT-nPCR was ≈90% for type A but lower (≈80%) for type B (Technical Appendix Table 3).
This study was not originally designed to compare rapid test kits and we can make no recommendations regarding the use of one test kit compared with another.
As the secondary endpoints, we evaluated the concordance rate between DS and the RASKET KIT for RAS mutations in the wild-type KRAS exon 2 population and the genotyping performance of the RASKET KIT compared with DS.
Similar(52)
States that did were not required to specify what portion was used to process rape kits, compared with other DNA testing, for which grant money can be spent under the law.
This study assessed the sensitivity of detection by 2 enzymatic assay kits compared with tandem mass spectrometry.
Objective: To compare clinical accuracy and ease of use for several of the new rapid one-step home urinary LH detection kits compared with the preexisting OvuQuick brand LH detection kit (designated as the standard).
A distinguishing feature of the encouraging interventions (Syk, JAK, and perhaps c-Kit) compared with p38 inhibitors is that the former targets are proximal in the signaling cascade.
In contrast, sunitinib possessed 85-fold and 100-fold greater affinity for Flt-3 and c-Kit compared with VEGFR-2 with Kiapp values of 0.6, 0.45, and 51 n M, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com