Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
The fact that at the date of the passage of the act goods of the kind in question had not been manufactured, cannot withdraw them from the class to which they belong, as described in the statute, where, as in the present case, the language fairly and clearly includes them.
Does that mean that one must know the reference-fixing description in order to refer to the kind in question?
But in order to work the explanations do not need to cite the actual causal mechanisms responsible for the behaviour of the members of the kind in question.
However, it might be argued that this line of argument fails to accommodate group-based injustices of the kind in question.
We cite a model or paradigm (fa) of the kind in question and try to show that the thing is or is not relevantly similar to it.
These objections might be directly incompatible with what that person accepts or they might threaten to undermine her reliability in making assessments of the kind in question.
Similar(44)
In cases of univocity, we expect single, non-disjunctive definitions which capture and state the essence of the kinds in question.
So in both cases the existence of a classification scheme can cause changes to the extension of the kinds in question.
But the actual details of how psychology takes neuroscientific discoveries into account depends both on the nature of the psychological kinds in question and the needs of theorizing specific to psychology.
They are supervenience theses that take the supervening set A to be the identity facts for particular entities of whatever kind is in question.
The KIND bars in question met my criteria.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com