kind for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "kind for" is not correct and it is not usable in written English.
You can use other forms of the word "kind" in a sentence, such as: Example: She was always kind and understanding towards her students.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He's so kind for one thing.

The New Yorker

Who did something kind for you today?

University of California, Berkeley

Not the kind for their feet.

The New York Times

Were displays of this kind for my benefit?

The New Yorker

There are many studies of this kind for Corexit 9500.

The New Yorker

Thanks for your kind for sharing this information.

Harvard University

The partnership is a first of its kind for Brita.

University of California, Berkeley

He felt himself to be too kind for that.

The Guardian

The partnership is the first of its kind for NOWNESS.com.

The Guardian

This hasn't always been of the welcome kind for Lineker.

The Guardian - Sport

A design problem of that kind for some dynamic system is set forth.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "kind for" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "kind of" or "suitable for" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "kind for" when they mean "kind of". Remember that "kind of" is the correct phrase to indicate a type or sort. For example, use "What kind of music do you like?" instead of the incorrect "What kind for music do you like?"

Linguistic Context

The phrase "kind for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, often intended to specify a category or suitability. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The examples in Ludwig show a mix of contexts where this phrase is used, but its non-standard nature should be noted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Wiki

23%

Science

20%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "kind for" appears across various platforms, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI notes, the phrase often intends to specify a category or suitability but fails to adhere to conventional grammatical rules. The analysis shows it's commonly found in news, wikis, and scientific contexts, but its non-standard nature suggests avoiding it in formal writing. Alternatives such as "type of" or "suitable for" are recommended for clearer, grammatically correct communication. Always opt for "kind of" when referring to a type or sort.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

type of

Replaces "kind" with a more general term for category or variety.

sort of

Similar to "type of", but slightly more informal.

suitable for

Focuses on appropriateness or fitness for a particular purpose.

appropriate for

Similar to "suitable for", emphasizing the correctness of something for a given situation.

fit for

Indicates that something is correctly sized or designed for a specific use.

right kind of

Specifies that a particular variety is needed or preferred.

ideal for

Highlights that something is the best option for a particular purpose.

perfect for

Similar to "ideal for", emphasizing the complete suitability of something.

designed for

Indicates that something was specifically created for a particular use.

intended for

Similar to "designed for", but emphasizing the planned or purposed use.

FAQs

How can I properly use "kind of" in a sentence?

Use "kind of" to specify a type or sort of something. For example, "What "kind of car" do you drive?" or "She has a "kind of charm" that is very appealing".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "kind of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "type of", "sort of", or "variety of". For instance, instead of "This is the "kind of book" I enjoy", you could say "This is the "type of book" I enjoy".

Is "kind for" ever correct in English?

Generally, "kind for" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's often a misuse of "kind of". However, it may appear in specific regional dialects or non-standard usage, but it's best to avoid it in formal writing.

What is the difference between "kind of" and "suitable for"?

"Kind of" specifies a type or category, while "suitable for" indicates that something is appropriate or well-suited for a particular purpose. For example, "This is the "kind of material" I prefer" (specifying the type) versus "This material is "suitable for sewing"" (indicating its appropriateness for sewing).