Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
kind dangerous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "kind dangerous" is not standard in written English and may be considered incorrect.
It could be used informally to describe something that is somewhat or mildly dangerous, but it is not widely accepted in formal writing. Example: "The weather can be kind dangerous during the storm season, so it's best to stay indoors."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
It is, moreover, labour of the hardest kind: dangerous, backbreaking and so tough on the skin that even the youngest men are far beyond the stage when moisturiser - even the sort supposedly favoured by their Norwegian colleagues - might afford them any benefit.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
In Colombia, we usually have flavored shots, and they taste delicious but are kind of dangerous -- however, not as dangerous as drinking a shot of pure vodka.
News & Media
Isn't that kind of dangerous?
News & Media
It was really kind of dangerous.
News & Media
See, Steve, he's kind of dangerous to be with.
News & Media
The subways were kind of dangerous, but also deeply democratic.
News & Media
It became kind of dangerous for both of us.
News & Media
"It was kind of dangerous," Mr. Lee admitted.
News & Media
"Some of these drinks are kind of dangerous," Mr. Friedman said.
News & Media
"It's all kind of dangerous," he said of the jobs in the oil patch.
News & Media
We've seen this kind of dangerous over-reach in the not-distant past.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity and precision, replace "kind dangerous" with more standard alternatives like "somewhat dangerous" or "slightly risky" to ensure your message is well-received and understood.
Common error
Avoid using informal intensifiers like "kind" in formal writing. While they may sound conversational, they often weaken the impact and credibility of your message. Instead, opt for stronger, more precise adjectives or adverbs.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "kind dangerous" functions as an adjectival modifier, attempting to describe the degree of danger. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is grammatically questionable and not standard English. The given example from Ludwig shows its occasional use but doesn't validate it as a correct form.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "kind dangerous" is an attempt to soften the description of something dangerous but, as Ludwig AI indicates, it is not considered grammatically correct or standard English. Its infrequency and presence mainly in informal contexts suggest that it is best to opt for more precise and widely accepted alternatives such as "somewhat dangerous" or "slightly risky". While understanding its meaning is helpful, especially when encountering it in casual media, actively using it is not advised in formal communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
somewhat dangerous
Indicates a lower degree of danger compared to "kind dangerous".
slightly perilous
Replaces "dangerous" with "perilous", suggesting a less immediate threat.
mildly hazardous
Substitutes "dangerous" with "hazardous", implying a potential for harm but not necessarily severe.
moderately risky
Uses "risky" instead of "dangerous", focusing on the probability of negative outcomes.
a bit unsafe
Replaces "dangerous" with "unsafe", conveying a general lack of security.
potentially harmful
Focuses on the potential for causing harm, rather than immediate danger.
a touch precarious
Emphasizes the instability or uncertainty of the situation.
rather threatening
Highlights the intimidating or menacing aspect of the situation.
somewhat alarming
Focuses on the capacity to cause concern or fear.
slightly treacherous
Implies hidden dangers or unreliability.
FAQs
Is "kind dangerous" grammatically correct?
The phrase "kind dangerous" is not considered grammatically standard in formal English. While it might appear in informal contexts, it's generally better to use alternatives like "somewhat dangerous" or "slightly risky" for clarity and correctness.
What can I say instead of "kind dangerous"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "somewhat dangerous", "moderately risky", or "potentially harmful". Choose the phrase that best reflects the specific level and type of danger you want to convey.
When is it appropriate to use "kind dangerous"?
While not generally recommended for formal writing, "kind dangerous" might be acceptable in very informal conversations or creative writing where a slightly unconventional tone is desired. However, be mindful of your audience and the overall context.
How does "kind dangerous" differ from "very dangerous"?
"Kind dangerous" implies a lower degree of danger than "very dangerous". "Very dangerous" suggests a high level of risk and potential for serious harm, while "kind dangerous" suggests a milder, less immediate threat. Consider using "rather dangerous" or "somewhat dangerous" for the appropriate level of risk.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested