Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
The regular tests include routine blood, urine and stool tests, liver and kidney function test, gastroscopy, ultrasonic examination in the upper abdomen and pregnancy test.
Ten of the 21 RCTs reported routine blood or urine examination results as well as liver and kidney function test results.
See also kidney function test.
* Liver function tests (LFT) and kidney function test (KFT).
Baseline evaluation included a complete past medical history focusing on heart, lung, and kidney function; physical examination; computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis; bone scan; complete blood counts; and renal and liver function tests.
The underlying physiological studies were investigated using lipid profile, kidney function tests and histopathological examination.
All patients were initially evaluated with a collection of history, physical examination, chest X-ray, complete blood cell (CBC) count, liver and kidney function tests, pregnancy test if female and ECG.
All participants underwent laboratory investigations such as complete blood count, ESR, liver and kidney functions, routine urine examination, and 24-h urinary protein.
All the patients had the following features, regarded as the phenotypes of kidney functions measured: urine examination for specific gravity evaluation, serum creatinine concentration, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) evaluation, as well as the serum concentrations of NGAL and urinary β2-MG.
This has advantages for patients getting a routine scan, where additional examinations for kidney function estimation could be avoided.
Participants underwent a screening, and those included had normal liver, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and kidney function assessed by medical history, physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine biochemical and hematological tests, as well as negative hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency viruses' serological tests.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com