Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
It takes 7,000 kg of grain to make 1,000 kg of beef".
All of these changes led to big gains for ranchers, who experienced an increase in productivity of 2.3x per kg of beef per hectare.
In 2017, according to the most recent UN Comtrade figures available, Poland exported more than 415m kg of beef, worth more than $1.5bn.
HMRC figures for that year show that the UK, one of Poland's largest markets for meat, bought 16m kg of beef (fresh, frozen and offal), worth £64m.
aProduction of 1 kg of beef requires an area of 20.9 m2, while 1 kg of cereals only requires about 1.4 m2 of arable land [54].
By way of example, according to the model calculations shown above, an adult in the USA would have to consume 12 kg of beef (0.587 μg PFOS/kg) or 12 L of milk (0.693 μg PFOS/L) per day (at the measured levels of contamination in the USA) in order to reach the TDI [26].
Similar(44)
When rations are carefully balanced, substantial savings could be made on pig feed. 2 880 kg (DM) of dairy or 657 kg (DM) of beef cattle manure produced per head per year.
According to several analyses, typical nonorganic beef production in the United States results in only 22 kg of CO2-equivalent GHG emissions per kilogram of beef, which is 0.3 kg less than the Swedish organic beef system (Johnson et al. 2003; Subak 1999).
Environmental impacts per kg of edible beef, however, vary largely due to differences in beef production systems.
Koneswaran and Nierenberg (2008) compared organic beef produced in Sweden (22.3 kg of carbon dioxide-equivalent GHG emissions per kilogram of beef) with unusual and resource-intensive Kobe beef production in Japan (36.4 kg of CO2-equivalent GHG emissions per kilogram) (Cederberg and Stadig 2003; Ogino et al. 2007).
At 9 30 am he was given a meal of 5 lb (2.3 kg) of raw beef, twelve large tallow candles totalling one pound (453 g), and a bottle of porter, all of which were consumed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com