Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Further delaying its development was the fact that yields from E. turbinate are extremely low; it takes 1000 kg of animals to isolate 1 g of trabectedin.
Similar(59)
Treatment was level of daily forage allowance (4, 8, 12, and 16 kg dry matter [DM] per 100 kg of animal body weight [BW]).
The ADDDK is the assumed average maintenance dose needed to treat one kg of animal during one day for the main indication in the target species in accordance with the Danish authorization document of the specific AVMP [ 13, 18].
The DDDANL is established per AVMP and species and represents the amount of AVMP (in g or mL or pieces) needed for the treatment of one kg of animal for one day in accordance to the mean authorized dosage for the target animal.
Since 1 kg of fresh animal wastes produces about 0.03 m3 gas, then Nigeria could produce about 6.8 million m3 of biogas every day.
Since 1 kg of fresh animal waste allows to produce about 0.03 m3 biogas, Nigeria can potentially produce about 6.8 million m3 of biogas every day from animal waste only [20].
Also, the standardized weight for a finisher pig in VETSTAT (Danish monitoring system for veterinary drug use at herd level [ 23]) is 50 kg [ 18] while the SDa uses a standardized weight of 70 kg for this category of animals.
The allowance of concentrate was increased in increments of 0.25 kg daily until 1.0 kg of concentrates per animal daily was attained.
The 100 to 200 mg dose of extract per kg of body weight of animal revealed significant activity when compared to reference anxiolytic drug called diazepam (1 mg/kg).
Overall, 6 animals received a high dose (300µg of DARPin 57.2 per kg of weight) and 3 animals received a low dose (30µg of DARPin 57.2 per kg of weight) (Table 1).
As it is shown in Table 4, feed conversion ratio (kg of DM intake by the animals per kg of body weight gain) was affected (P < 0.05) by the treatments during the different months of the experiment and the total feeding period.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com