Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
For the channel R, in the case of the Fig. 4g, the reduction obtained is of 2 kb compared with the original size of 40 kb of Fig. 4a, and h is limited to 4 kb from the original size of 48 kb of Fig. 4b; this represents a reduction between 90 and 91.66% in the storage and memory requirements that potentially could provide a real-time solution to save image transmission time over networks.
These numbers reflect a greater uniformity in length in deletions found in hotspots, with 68% being between 20 and 200 kb, compared with 50.2% for non-HS deletions (chi square 4.01, p<0.05) falling within this size range.
The average length of 289 FlyBase genes with the intronic UCEs is 43 kb compared with 4.9 kb for the remaining genes.
However, the upstream region of Gm5938 has many insertions and deletions and shows π = 0.43 for about 4 kb compared with that of Obp1a.
The pruned dataset contains 495 SNPs and an average distance between SNPs of 22.4 kb compared with 14.9 kb in the full set of 759 SNPs.
The reduced size of the input WGA (∼15 kb) compared with unamplified DNA (∼50 kb) required specific modifications to the Illumina MP fragmentation protocols.
Similar(38)
The frequency of long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), mainly CR1 and L2 elements, is exceptionally high, at 0.39 per kb, as compared with 0.07 per kb in zebrafinch and 0.02 per kb in chicken.
The mean NUPT content for polyplastidic species was 460 kb as compared with only 6 kb for monoplastidic taxa.
However, the gap between mbtJ (lipK) and mbtI (trpE2) in M. paratuberculosis 43525 was 2 kb shorter compared with the 6.6 kb spacer region in M. paratuberculosis K10 (Fig. 4).
The estimated lengths of eight clones differed by 10 kb on average (7 16 kb) when compared with the expected values obtained by mapping the BAC-end sequences to the reference genome assembly.
A strong bias exists within the RGA cluster, with one SSR every 1.1 Kb compared to the flanking sequences with one SSR every 2.6 kb.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com