Sentence examples for justification understood from inspiring English sources

The word 'always' is important here because externalists need not, and indeed should not, assert that justification, understood externalistically in terms of reliability, is never recognizable on reflection.

Thus, public justification is understood in terms of publicity.

One of them represents minimal knowledge, the other is related to the ideas of justification (as understood in default logic) and of negation as failure.

The two can overlap, and do overlap when rational justification is understood in an end-directed way that is, where trust is rationally justified because it is instrumentally valuable, or because it serves one's ends.

But there are views of justification which understand it qualitatively, with potentially significant differences between adjacent levels or grades of justification (compare Chisholm 1989 and Conee and Feldman 2004: esp. 277 306)).

Code agrees with Sosa's direction of analysis thesis, endorsing the idea that primary justification is best understood as attaching to stable dispositions to act in certain ways, while secondary justification accrues to particular acts because of their sources in virtues.

This is a problem because it is not at all evident how epistemic justification should be understood, and classical accounts of that notion have turned out to be severely problematic.

The nature and standards for warrant or justification for behavior, understood broadly to include belief formation, might depend on whether or not the behavior in question occurs in the context of shared activity.

The evolutionary approach to public justification can be understood in terms of what James March calls "adaptive" rationality rather than "calculated" rationality, where rationality is achieved when an agent adapts effectively to her environment regardless of how she does so (March 1978).

In light of these failures, Gaus argues that parties to the process of public justification must be understood as intrinsically rule-following in ways that sometimes frustrates their own goals, rejecting the bargaining view, and that the parties acknowledge that discourse will not resolve their disagreements, rejecting the discursive view.

First, regardless of their ultimate origin or justification, human rights are understood to represent both individual and group demands for political power, wealth, enlightenment, and other cherished values or capabilities, the most fundamental of which is respect and its constituent elements of reciprocal tolerance and mutual forbearance in the pursuit of all other such values or capabilities.