Suggestions(3)
Exact(5)
It says merely that, if your perceptual experiences are a source of justification for you, you must have justification for believing them to be reliable.
According to the kind of coherentism we considered above, if your perceptual experiences are a source of justification for you, it must be the case that you have considered the matter and believe them to be reliable.
Because of the way they conceive of basicality, they cannot say that perceptual experiences are a source of justification for you because you have a reason, R, for believing that they do.
One problem that arises for this approach is the following: Many epistemologists share the intuition that, if an evil demon deceives you and your perceptual experiences are therefore completely misleading you, they are nevertheless a source of justification for you because, from your own, internal point of view, such deception is not detectable.
But while being hungry may not stand up in court as justification for you smashing a hole through their ceiling with a broom, it might ease your conscience knowing that somewhere, somehow, it's chemical – that it kind of isn't your fault.
Similar(54)
This is just like all these other guys so we shouldn't distinguish it and hints there is a justification for what you're doing, but you arrive at that by not saying things about what we know about the object which make it distinct from all the other guys.
An abusive man who points to his abusive childhood as a justification for hitting you is, on the surface, giving you a "reason".
"It is like having a justification for what you do on a daily basis".
There could never be a justification for what you have done," she said.
I am sure there is some "walk-in-my-shoes" point of view here that I could try to see, but right now I do not see it, and no matter what it is, I cannot see a justification for what you have done.
True, the show is celebrating it's 40th anniversary this year, is that justification enough for you?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com