Sentence examples for justification for restricting from inspiring English sources

But in an order handed down by Cranston on Tuesday, he told both parties: "Against the background of the principle of open justice, it is difficult to see a justification for restricting publication of documents which are generally available under [court] rules".

Given this, the concern to preserve one's native culture seems to provide a reasonable justification for restricting immigration.

The dissenters in Citizens United accepted Congress' judgment this is a compelling justification for restricting political expenditures.

Simply stated, that principle holds that the government must always have a rational, public-oriented justification for restricting people's liberty.

Indeed, if we really believe spending money on elections ought to be protected free speech, then what is the justification for restricting any speech?

Because our survey suggests that the prevalence of ErbB2-positive tumors is not related to country income level, at least there is no epidemiologic justification for restricting ErbB2 assessment and treatment in lower income countries.

So reformers increasingly argue (see their justifications for restricting citizens' "527" groups) that regulating the timing, amount and content of political advocacy is necessary to improve the tone of politics.

In establishing the basic theoretical framework of paternalism based on the conditions and justifications for restricting freedom and autonomy, Dworkin differentiated among various types of paternalism as hard or soft, broad or narrow, weak or strong, pure or impure, and moral or welfare.

Whereas Mill appears to reject the regulation of mere offense, the harm principle appears to be the one justification he recognizes for restricting liberty.

However, Dworkin thinks, considerations of offence may provide some justification for preventing or restricting the public display of pornography so as to avoid its causing offense to non-consenting adults who might otherwise involuntarily or unwittingly be exposed to it.

Washburn University School of Law professor Craig Martin writes in "Going Medieval: Targeted Killing, Self-Defense and the Jus ad Bellum Regime" that self-defence is not an appropriate rationale for targeted killing because such a justification is restricted to conflicts between state actors.