justifiable to exclude

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "justifiable to exclude" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasoning or rationale behind excluding something or someone from a group or consideration. Example: "In this case, it is justifiable to exclude certain data points that do not align with our research criteria."

✓ Grammatically correct

Health Economics Review

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

While it is tempting to only invest in those strategies that yield benefits for government, it is questionable whether it is justifiable to exclude treatment from some groups on the basis of having a low fiscal return for government.

Health Economics Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The trial court in Camden County, after hearing prosecutors argue that Mr. Carty and the driver were acting nervous, found the search justifiable and refused to exclude the evidence.

The New York Times

They were designed to exclude.

The New Yorker

Never to exclude.

Los Angeles Times

Would I have thought it justifiable to use wire tapping?

The Guardian

It sounds burdensome and not justifiable to me.

The New York Times

Is it ethically justifiable to stop doing everything that could be done for a patient?

The New York Times - Health

They anguish about when, if ever, it is justifiable to lie to the young.

The New York Times

If so, is it morally justifiable to attempt to convert others to a different perspective?

SEP

Thus, it is hardly justifiable to convert arable land from food production to energy cropping.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

It is justifiable to bear the consequences, but these rockets have no purpose.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "justifiable to exclude", ensure the context clearly outlines the reasons or criteria that make the exclusion valid. Providing explicit reasoning enhances the clarity and defensibility of your decision.

Common error

Avoid using "justifiable to exclude" as a blanket statement without specific, well-reasoned support. Vague justifications can undermine the credibility of the exclusion and lead to misinterpretations or disputes.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "justifiable to exclude" serves as an adjective phrase functioning as a predicate adjective. It indicates that there is a valid reason or justification for excluding something or someone. As indicated by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and can be used to discuss reasoning behind exclusion.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "justifiable to exclude" is a grammatically correct expression used to convey that there is a valid and reasonable basis for excluding something. According to Ludwig, its usage appears mainly in scientific and news contexts. The phrase leans towards a neutral to formal register, indicating careful and reasoned decision-making. When employing this phrase, providing the reasoning is crucial to ensure transparency and avoid misinterpretations. Alternatives such as "reasonable to omit" or "defensible to leave out" may be more appropriate in some contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

justified in excluding

Shifts the grammatical structure while retaining the core meaning of justification.

appropriate to exclude

Suggests that the exclusion is suitable or fitting for the situation.

reasonable to omit

Focuses on the rationality behind leaving something out.

warranted to exclude

Suggests that the exclusion is supported by sufficient reason or evidence.

defensible to leave out

Highlights the ability to argue in favor of excluding something.

acceptable to exclude

Indicates that the exclusion is generally agreed upon or tolerated.

permissible to exclude

Emphasizes the allowance or authorization to exclude.

legitimate to exclude

Highlights the lawfulness or validity of the exclusion.

ethical to exclude

Focuses specifically on the moral or ethical basis for exclusion.

excusable to exclude

Focuses on mitigating circumstances that make the exclusion understandable, if not ideal.

FAQs

When is it "justifiable to exclude" data in research?

It's justifiable to exclude data when it's identified as erroneous, irrelevant to the study's objectives, or if it introduces bias. Clear documentation of the reasons for exclusion is crucial for transparency and reproducibility.

What are some alternatives to saying "justifiable to exclude"?

You can use alternatives like "reasonable to omit", "defensible to leave out", or "appropriate to exclude" depending on the specific context.

How does ethical consideration play a role in deciding if something is "justifiable to exclude"?

Ethical considerations are paramount when determining if something is "justifiable to exclude". It involves assessing whether the exclusion unfairly disadvantages any group or violates principles of fairness, transparency, or inclusivity.

Is it always "justifiable to exclude" outliers in a dataset?

Not always. While it might be justifiable to exclude outliers resulting from measurement errors, excluding valid outliers can distort the true distribution and mask important phenomena. The decision should be based on a thorough understanding of the data and potential biases.