Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Justices use oral argument to develop their thinking in a case.
So why couldn't the justices use the National Academies as advisers?
Supreme Court Justices use judicial craft and precedent to distinguish their reasoning from mere attitude, but in the end, in hard cases, their reasoning does not escape their basic values.
Given how certain justices use sarcasm in oral arguments, one would think that there is no backlog of cases in the courts; that certain justices have little respect for the enormous amount of tax dollars these proceedings cost; and that they aren't mindful of the effect these decisions have on ordinary people's lives.
"It seems to me that the costumes are an integral part of freedom of religion (speech) as the wearing of orthodox Jewish garb, nuns habits, or even justices use of robes.
("Magic words" really is the phrase that Justices use in opinions about this stuff.
Similar(52)
The conservative justices used and endorsed a dramatically unrestrained approach there.
(The justices used varying numbers in describing the number of affected prisoners. California's prison population has been declining).
On Feb. 20 alone, three justices used flooding as a metaphor in talking about the consequences of the court's rulings.
Through most of the Supreme Court's history, justices used statutes and legal precedents in their rulings, leaving out facts about the outside world.
Massachusetts "buffer zones" around abortion clinics were struck down, unanimously (although different justices used different rationales to arrive at the same conclusion).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com