Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(57)
Shame on our Supreme Court justices for doing so.
There seemed little enthusiasm among the justices for that categorical approach.
There appeared to be little support among the justices for that approach.
It takes only four justices for the Supreme Court to decide to consider a case.
The groups asked the justices for a summary reversal of the appeals court's ruling.
Two cases, in broad terms, will go before the Justices for review.
Cruz duelled with Stephen Breyer and other skeptical Justices for well over the allotted thirty minutes.
Mr Bush should bear that in mind, particularly when it comes to nominating justices for the Supreme Court.
If you want something more from us, I hear him as implying, then maybe we're not the justices for you.
Are the current justices the right justices for the job we ask the Supreme Court to do?
Similar(1)
The unelected justices-for-life did democracy a favor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com