justice on whether

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "justice on whether" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to discuss a decision or evaluation regarding justice, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The court must decide justice on whether the defendant acted in self-defense."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Pressed by the lord chief justice on whether any agreement with the EU would eventually be subject to approval by parliament, James Eadie QC, for the government, confirmed that it was likely.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Pressed by the justices on whether publication could be blocked if 100 Americans would certainly die as a result, he reluctantly agreed: "I am afraid that my inclinations to humanity overcome the somewhat more abstract devotion to the First Amendment".

The New York Times

pool," in which eight of the court's nine justices had their clerks share the work of screening incoming cases, with a single clerk writing an advisory memorandum to all of the participating justices on whether the case ought to be accepted.

The New York Times

On the polarized court, that might depend on whether justices who feel strongly on either side can be confident of prevailing.

The New York Times

The answer appeared to depend on whether the justices saw the case through the prism of criminal law or of public health: whether the tests and arrests constituted law enforcement in the service of medical care or doctors serving as agents of the police.

The New York Times

EVERYONE FEELS ENTITLED People tend to think that they have justice on their side, whether it comes to making or taking.

The New York Times

The outcome of a major case on labor unions before the Supreme Court on Monday may turn on whether the conservative justices adopt a broad view of the free-speech rights of public employees, a position that liberals had favored before.

Los Angeles Times

A vehicle for doing so, the Proposition 8 case from California (Hollingsworth v. Perry) is sitting on the court's docket, awaiting the justices' decision on whether to take it.

The New York Times

During the argument on Wednesday, the justices' focus on whether the detainees were being offered an adequate substitute appeared to assume that either a reasonable substitute or habeas corpus itself had to be provided.

The New York Times

Our colleague, Adam Liptak, reporting from the morning's session, says the justices focused on whether the whole law would have to go or could part of it be left intact without the individual mandate provision.

The New York Times

In a 2004 case, the justices split on whether there was a workable standard to determine when partisan gerrymandering becomes unconstitutional.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or ethical considerations, use precise and grammatically correct phrases like "justice regarding" or "justice in relation to" for clear communication.

Common error

Do not use the phrase "justice on whether" as it is grammatically incorrect and can lead to confusion. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives to ensure your meaning is accurately conveyed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "justice on whether" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Based on Ludwig AI's analysis, it does not convey a clear meaning. When used, it seems intended to introduce a condition or point of evaluation related to justice, but it lacks proper grammatical structure.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

34%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "justice on whether" is considered grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms this assessment. While some instances appear in various sources, including news and media, it's advisable to avoid this phrase in favor of more precise and grammatically sound alternatives such as "justice regarding" or "justice in relation to". For clearer communication, use alternatives like "determination of justice" or "assessment of fairness" to convey your intended meaning effectively. Always prioritize grammatical correctness to ensure accurate understanding.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

determination of justice

Focuses on the act of determining what is just.

deciding on the fairness

Rephrases as a decision-making process regarding fairness.

assessment of fairness

Emphasizes the evaluation of fairness in a situation.

establishing just outcomes

Focuses on creating fair results or consequences.

finding a just resolution

Emphasizes the process of discovering a fair solution.

evaluation of righteousness

Highlights the assessment of moral correctness.

determining the equity

Highlights the determination of impartiality and fairness.

judging the merits of the case

Shifts focus to judging the specific details and worth of a legal case.

concluding the justice aspect

Rephrases as reaching a conclusion about the justice component.

resolution of the matter of justice

Formalizes the expression to focus on resolving a legal dispute related to justice.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the word "justice" when discussing a decision or evaluation?

Instead of "justice on whether", use phrases like "justice regarding" or "justice in relation to". For example, "The court must decide justice regarding whether the defendant acted in self-defense" is better than "The court must decide justice on whether the defendant acted in self-defense".

What are some alternatives to the incorrect phrase "justice on whether"?

Consider using phrases like "determination of justice", "assessment of fairness", or "evaluation of righteousness" depending on the specific context.

Is "justice on whether" grammatically correct?

No, "justice on whether" is not grammatically correct. It is best to use more precise and grammatically sound phrases to ensure clarity in your writing.

What is the best way to express the concept of evaluating fairness in a legal context?

Use phrases like "assessing the equity", "determining the fairness", or "evaluating the righteousness" to clearly convey the idea of evaluating fairness. Avoid using the ambiguous "justice on whether".