Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Your Dec. 28 editorial "Temple to Justice" is correct in noting that the current Supreme Court does not now fully function as "a moral force in American life".
By creating us in our sinfulness, God assures that each individual will develop an authentic moral identity, and, if the theistic tradition concerning divine justice is correct, prepares each for the eternal recompense appropriate to his character.
Thus, if THE CHIEF JUSTICE is correct that an insurance purchase requirement can be applied only to those who actively" consume health care, the minimum coverage provision fits the bill.
Similar(57)
Your Nov. 17 editorial "Blinding Justice" was correct that the writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental safeguard against wrongful conviction.
The justices are correct to be concerned that the process go forward quickly enough to preserve the right of Florida voters to be accurately represented in the Electoral College.
Justice Alito is correct that the times are changing rapidly for the death penalty.
JUSTICE STEVENS is correct, post at 291, that one of the informant's predictions proved to be inaccurate.
Jon Reiner New York City Jeffrey Toobin, in his piece on the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, is correct in writing that Breyer "possesses the record for the longest tenure as the nine-member court's junior Justice — eleven years" ("Without a Paddle," September 27th).
If Justice Stevens is correct that all cause-of-action questions may be regarded as jurisdictional questions, and thus capable of being decided where there is no genuine case or controversy, it is hard to see what is left of that limitation in Article III.
On this point, astoundingly, Justice Scalia is correct.
Thus, while Justice Thomas is correct that Heffernan's right to speak freely was not violated, Heffernan did plausibly allege that he was the victim of arbitrary treatment by government officials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com