"justice holding" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to the concept of justice as an act of upholding or enforcing the law, fairness, and equity. For example, "The judge sought to maintain justice holding by ensuring that everyone involved in the case was treated equally and fairly."
Fran Lebowitz, as Justice, holding scales in one hand and a sword in the other, regards the viewer with that dour look that sets up the punch line.
It is represented by a woman (sometimes identified with Astraea, the Roman goddess of justice), holding a balance scale or by the balance alone.
However, Raab played down the idea that a government document ruling out the European court of justice holding "direct jurisdiction" on UK matters left room for the ECJ to exercise influence on British law.
Donald Trump's supreme court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, declared on Tuesday he had made no promises to Trump or anyone else about how he would vote on abortion or other issues and testified that he would have no trouble as a justice holding anyone accountable, including the president who picked him.
Lady Justice had a firm grip on the scales of justice, holding our country's moral fate in the balance.
Taft for some years breakfasting, when present Chief Justice held Kent Chair of International Law at Yale.
Restorative justice holds that crime is committed not against the state but against a victim and against God.
In his ruling Igor Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, held that the principle of confidentiality between intelligence agencies was "not absolute".
We note that the environmental justice implications of these observations are dependent upon conceptions of justice held, and reflect on the challenge of testing, through empirical longitudinal analysis, the notion that environmental sustainability and social justice are incompatible.
Both Barr and Kavanaugh, now a Supreme Court justice, hold significant roles in the future of any investigations of the president and his associates.
Writing for the majority, the chief justice held that the minimum coverage requirement (known as the mandate) represents a constitutional exercise of Congress' taxing powers.
