justice for

USAGE SUMMARY

"justice for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the act or idea of providing or seeking justice, or to refer to the cause of social justice, such as "justice for all." For example, you could write, "We must unite to demand justice for everyone."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"Justice for Trayvon!" they shouted.

The New York Times

Was there justice for her?

The New Yorker

There will be justice for Brittany".

Independent

Let there be justice for all.

Independent

He wanted only justice for his son.

The New York Times

His slogan is "Justice for All".

The Economist

I just want justice for Brian".

The New York Times

GOWDY: Justice for those that killed them.

Independent

Justice for All?

Columbia University

Equal justice for millionaires.

Harvard University

"Justice for injustice".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "justice for", be specific about what injustice you are addressing. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "justice for" without specifying the affected group or the specific wrong that needs to be righted. Broad statements like "justice for all" can lack impact without a clear context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "justice for" primarily functions as a rallying cry or a slogan. It aims to express solidarity and demand fair treatment or retribution in response to perceived wrongs. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

20%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Science

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "justice for" is a powerful and widely used expression that serves as a rallying cry for various social and political causes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and highly versatile. With a very common usage frequency, it’s observed primarily in News & Media and Academia, indicating its relevance in both public discourse and scholarly analysis. While generally neutral, it often carries an emotional charge, especially in activist contexts. Remember to specify the injustice you're addressing to maximize clarity and impact. By being mindful of these nuances, you can effectively use "justice for" to advocate for fairness and social change.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fairness for

Replaces "justice" with "fairness", emphasizing equitable treatment.

equity for

Substitutes "justice" with "equity", highlighting impartiality and equal opportunity.

rights for

Focuses on the "rights" aspect, implying a need for the protection or enforcement of legal or moral entitlements.

vindication for

Emphasizes clearing someone of blame or suspicion, offering a more specific form of justice.

redress for

Highlights correcting a wrong, often involving compensation or amends.

accountability for

Shifts the focus to holding someone responsible for their actions.

just treatment for

Replaces "justice" with "just treatment", focusing on ethical and reasonable conduct.

due process for

Specifically refers to the legal procedures that must be followed before someone can be deprived of life, liberty, or property.

a fair shake for

An informal expression meaning to give someone an equal opportunity or a just outcome.

a square deal for

Another informal phrase suggesting fairness and honesty in dealings.

FAQs

How is "justice for" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "justice for" is typically used to advocate for fairness or redress in a specific situation, such as "justice for Trayvon" or "justice for Grenfell".

What are some alternative ways to express the sentiment of "justice for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "fairness for", "rights for", or demanding "accountability for" a particular situation.

Is it grammatically correct to say "justice for all"?

Yes, "justice for all" is a grammatically correct and widely recognized phrase, often used in political and social contexts to express the ideal of equal justice under the law.

What's the difference between "justice for" and "injustice against"?

"Justice for" advocates for a positive outcome of fairness or redress, while "injustice against" highlights the existence of a wrong or unfair act committed.