Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
When the original version of the treaty proposal was published, experts from the Danish ministry of justice decided that nine paragraphs conflicted fundamentally with the Danish constitution and a referendum was scheduled for 2005, but after the referendums in Holland and France, which rejected the constitution, the idea of a Danish referendum was put to rest.
A three-panel tribunal formed at the request of the Bar by the Supreme Court chief justice decided that to publicly reprimand was a sufficient punishment.
Similar(58)
The majority of justices decided that states should.
In fact, the justices decided that "society needs workers in all levels of jobs, the majority of which may very well be low level".
The justices decided that the Proposition 8 supporters who filed the appeal lacked the authority to defend the law after the governor and the state attorney general refused to do so.
The Proposition 8 lawsuit did not succeed in obtaining the broad Supreme Court ruling that Olson and Griffin had hoped for; the justices decided that their opponents didn't have standing, and left in place a lower-court ruling overturning California's ban.
At the same time, however, the justices decided that the ban cannot be applied to people who already have some sort of connection to the U.S. The court specifically mentioned university students who are from the banned countries, as well as "a worker who accepted an offer of employment from an American company or a lecturer invited to address an American audience".
At a recent Supreme Court hearing in London, it was announced that five of the seven justices weighing his case decided that Sweden's extradition request, something Assange has contested for months, is lawful, and therefore he must go.
And if the justices decide that Congress lacks the power to permit rape victims to sue their attackers in federal court, that must be because the issue is unquestionably local.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved a bill from Senator Arlen Specter that would compel the court to permit televised coverage of all open sessions — unless a majority of justices decides that doing so would violate due process rights of one or both parties.
What happens if the five conservative justices decide that the Constitution prohibits, for instance, a broad expansion of Medicaid or a jobs guarantee?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com