Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

just to avoid

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "just to avoid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to introduce an explanation for why you are doing or not doing something. For example: I used a different route today just to avoid the traffic.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

But it's just to avoid hassles.

Marbury had to dress just to avoid a forfeit.

Sometimes one was needed just to avoid arbitrary arrest.

News & Media

The New York Times

" Similarly, animals and plants must continually adapt and evolve just to avoid going extinct.

"We're not going into the Championship aiming just to avoid relegation.

News & Media

Independent

That culture blocks vital investment just to avoid sensible tax increases.

News & Media

The New York Times

Is this just to avoid spoilers or could he be back in a flashback?

News & Media

Independent

Instead, they are talking about China's need to keep moving forward just to avoid falling down.

News & Media

The Economist

"You'd think they'd make it a little bigger just to avoid the innuendo".

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

I go the long way just to avoid their happiness.

News & Media

The Guardian

Um -- didn't we buy a DVD just to avoid having to do that?

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "just to avoid", ensure that the action being avoided is clearly stated and that the reason for avoidance is logical within the context of the sentence.

Common error

Avoid using "just to avoid" when the action taken doesn't logically prevent the stated outcome. Ensure a direct causal relationship between the action and the avoidance.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "just to avoid" functions as an adverbial phrase of purpose, indicating the reason for an action. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature in written English. Examples show it clarifying the intent behind choices, like avoiding traffic or confrontation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Academia

15%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

6%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "just to avoid" is a versatile phrase used to clearly state the purpose behind an action, specifically the undesirable outcome being prevented. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, especially in news and media. When using this phrase, ensure the action logically prevents the stated outcome. Consider alternatives like "in order to evade" or "so as to circumvent" for different nuances. Remember, it's better to take a detour "just to avoid traffic".

FAQs

How can I use "just to avoid" in a sentence?

You can use "just to avoid" to explain the purpose behind an action, indicating that the action is taken to prevent something undesirable from happening. For example, "I took a detour "just to avoid traffic"."

What are some alternatives to "just to avoid"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in order to evade", "so as to circumvent", or "with the intention of preventing", each offering a slightly different nuance in expressing the reason for avoidance. Consider using "to steer clear of" for a more direct approach.

Is it always necessary to use "just to avoid"?

No, it's not always necessary. The choice depends on whether you want to explicitly state the reason for avoidance. Sometimes, the context makes the reason clear without needing to specify it with "just to avoid". However, being explicit can enhance clarity.

What's the difference between "just to avoid" and "in order to avoid"?

"Just to avoid" implies a more casual or immediate reason for avoidance, whereas "in order to avoid" suggests a more formal or planned approach. While both are correct, the choice depends on the tone and formality of your writing. For instance, you might say, "I left early "just to avoid the rush"" in a casual conversation, but "measures were taken "in order to avoid further delays"" in a formal report.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: