Sentence examples for jurisprudence requires from inspiring English sources

Rather, it is about a callous, well-developed body of Supreme Court law interpreting A.E.D.P.A. and how much deference — submission, really — to that process the Court's habeas jurisprudence requires.

Rather, it is about a callous, well-developed body of Supreme Court law interpreting A.E.D.P.A. and how much deference— submission, really to that process the Court's habeas jurisprudence requires.

The call to convert is no rhetorical flourish; Islamic jurisprudence requires that non-believers be given a chance before they are attacked.These are mostly familiar themes, though intelligence analysts will search the sermon (and a second internet message) for clues about his intentions, whereabouts (thought to be Pakistan's border region) and state of health.

First, Islamic jurisprudence requires that the Qur'an be taken as primary authority on all Islamic matters.

His theory of sociological jurisprudence required that inherited legal codes and traditions be adjusted to reflect contemporary social conditions.

In any event, even if the rule had been otherwise at common law, our modern jurisprudence would require that there be a mens rea requirement now.

Four more favourable rulings would establish jurisprudence and require the federal legislature to reform Mexico's prohibitive laws.

Overall, the Inter-American system has managed to develop valuable jurisprudence that still requires more work in terms of influencing state compliance.

(Although Scalia and Thomas presumably believe that abortion should be illegal, their jurisprudence doesn't require states to make it illegal).

Thus, students from the United States and Puerto Rico are strongly encouraged to take at least one course that is primarily focused on legal theory or jurisprudence and are required to write a paper of at least 50 pages in length.

But there was Richard A. Posner, one of the most distinguished judges in the land and a member of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, saying he was mistaken in one of the most contentious issues in American politics and jurisprudence: laws that require people to show identification before they can vote.