Inspired by the doctrinal paradox in jurisprudence, the problem of judgment aggregation attracted the interest of political scientists, philosophers, logicians, economists and computer scientists.
This Therapeutic Jurisprudence model of problem solving courts draws heavily on social cognitive psychology and more specifically on theories of procedural justice, motivation, and anticipated emotion to offer an explanation of how offenders respond to these programs.
Italian jurisprudence dealt with the problem of the relevance and validity of will previously expressed by a patient who, for pathological reasons, is no longer able to express such a will.
The technical term is "therapeutic jurisprudence", sometimes known as "problem-solving justice".
"The criminal justice system simply moves too slowly and is constrained by too many 'formidable procedural obstacles,' as Judge [Richard A.] Posner puts it" — in his book "The Problems of Jurisprudence" — "to reliably punish campus rapists and remove them from the academic community".
And defining that word would not solve any of the problems of jurisprudence (as Hart pointed out).
This matter of jurisprudence lends itself to problems in the light of some of the points raised below (Andrade and Rao 2013).
The architects of modern conservative jurisprudence have sought to address the problem of judicial activism by developing "originalist" methods of constitutional interpretation.
The problem is that constitutional jurisprudence, however essential it is to the rule of law, will always tend to produce a history in which the entire eighteenth century is reduced to the intellectual lives of a handful of men.
By the late 19th century, positivists were dominating international jurisprudence, largely because they avoided the problem, characteristic of natural-law theorists, of confusing international morality with international law and because they based their theories on the actual practice of states.
