The word "jurisprudence" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is an official term used in law and can be used to refer to the study and philosophy of law or the body of laws and legal principles of a particular state or country. For example, "His career was devoted to the research and understanding of jurisprudence."
The public deserves to know how the governing jurisprudence is developing.
It is a jurisprudence built in the dark.
Related: Google says it acknowledges some people want 'right to be forgotten' The letter cites Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy counsel, who reportedly told a meeting of European data experts in May that Google was "building a rich program of jurisprudence on the [RTBF] decision".
Peter Fleischer, Google global privacy counsel, reportedly told the 5th European Data Protection Days on 4 May that, "Over time, we are building a rich program of jurisprudence on the [RTBF] decision".
The letter describes that process as "jurisprudence built in the dark".
Her resignation letter also makes clear that she regards the departures of Kenneth Clarke and the former attorney general Dominic Grieve in the recent reshuffle as not incidental, but symbolic of a new and more casual approach to international jurisprudence.
The court's previous religion jurisprudence, unchallenged by Ms Galloway and Ms Stephens, permits public prayer.
No Supreme Court justice has championed a reading of the 14th amendment that requires public universities to employ affirmative action, and for good reason: such an interpretation would be untenably activist and represent a radical break with decades of the court's jurisprudence.
And based on how the court's previous decisions construe the 14th amendment, upholding the ban will be in keeping with the court's equal-protection jurisprudence over the past few decades.That said, the 58% of Michigan voters who added the affirmative-action ban to their constitution have decreased minority enrollments in their state.
Smith's fat volumes on jurisprudence are not the work of man who believes public policy to be pointless, or that government rules are not necessary for prosperity.
The majority's approach, Justice Scalia charged, is "result-driven antitextualism" that "befogs" the law and promises to "bedevil our jurisprudence" with years of litigation.
