The phrase "jurisdictional scope" is correct and commonly used in written English, particularly in legal and government contexts.
It refers to the geographical or subject matter boundaries within which a particular jurisdiction or authority has the power to make and enforce laws. Example: "The court's jurisdictional scope extends to all cases involving property disputes within the county's borders." In this sentence, "jurisdictional scope" is used to describe the specific range of cases that fall under the court's authority.
An international cross-jurisdictional policy scoping review was conducted.
This international cross-jurisdictional policy scoping reveals that transition has received little government attention.
Historically, alongside regulatory and jurisdictional differences in scope of practices, practice patterns of naturopathic doctors (NDs) have varied widely to promote holistic or whole-person treatment using a variety of therapies including: controlled substances, minor surgery, a variety of complementary therapies, as well as both novel and conventional assessments.
Cross-jurisdictional differences in regulatory scope may pose an additional challenge for some groups.
Applying Abbott's classification system of jurisdictional settlements to the prescribing scope of nurses in Western European and Anglo-Saxon countries, it is clear that the jurisdiction over the prescribing task in most countries, apart from the UK and Ireland, remains predominantly with the medical profession.
Jurisdictional boundaries, such as define the scope of a technology (e.g. 'tissue engineering') or a governance domain (e.g. 'enterprise' or 'public health') can be difficult to establish in political processes, reflecting conflicting framings of economically important emerging zones.
Although QOF is not a fully comprehensive quality dataset, it exceeds all previous cross-jurisdictional comparisons in terms of the scope and coverage of primary care clinical activity.
For instance, step 1a definition of the decision space makes explicit the scoping consideration that adaptation activities are typically organized at a particular jurisdictional level [city or county, state (in the case of the United States), regional consortium, or country], and that CCA activities are often nested within multiple relevant jurisdictions.
Talk about jurisdictional issues!
