jumping to conclusions

USAGE SUMMARY

"jumping to conclusions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express the idea of prematurely forming an opinion or making a decision without sufficient evidence. Example sentence: We should avoid jumping to conclusions without doing the necessary research.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They aren't jumping to conclusions".

The Guardian - Sport

You're really jumping to conclusions.

The New Yorker

Mr. Espenshade cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

The New York Times

I'm not jumping to conclusions here.

The Guardian - Opinion

Etchells, however, warns against jumping to conclusions.

The Guardian

But beware of jumping to conclusions.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Rezendes says jumping to conclusions impedes learning.

The New York Times - Arts

Others, however, have cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

The Guardian

We are not at this stage jumping to conclusions.

The New York Times

The Egyptians, including Mr Rahmi, warn against jumping to conclusions.

Independent

Mr Putin, meanwhile, gave a warning against jumping to conclusions.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When faced with incomplete information, acknowledge the uncertainty and avoid presenting assumptions as facts. Clearly differentiate between speculation and verified information to maintain credibility.

Common error

Don't assume you have the full picture when only some facts are available. Prematurely filling in the gaps with assumptions can lead to misunderstandings and flawed decisions. Always seek further information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "jumping to conclusions" functions as an idiom, often used as a warning against making hasty judgments without sufficient evidence. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct and usable in written English, reinforcing its grammatical soundness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Academia

4%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "jumping to conclusions" is a common idiomatic phrase used to advise against forming opinions or making decisions without adequate evidence. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and usability. It is frequently found in news and media, as well as scientific and business contexts. To avoid this pitfall, it's best to gather sufficient information and consider alternative explanations before making a judgment. Related phrases include "rushing to conclusions" and "leaping to conclusions", which similarly emphasize the haste and lack of evidence in decision-making.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rushing to conclusions

Focuses on the speed and haste of the decision-making process.

leaping to conclusions

Emphasizes the act of making a quick, unsupported inference.

drawing hasty inferences

Highlights the speed and potential inaccuracy of the inference.

forming premature judgments

Underscores the earliness and potential lack of validity in the judgment.

coming to quick conclusions

Highlights the speed with which conclusions are reached.

making snap judgments

Suggests a quick, often impulsive decision.

jumping to assumptions

Focuses on making assertions without solid evidence.

taking for granted

Implies accepting something as true without proper examination.

assuming without proof

Emphasizes the lack of supporting evidence for the assumption.

inferring without evidence

Highlights the lack of factual basis for the inference.

FAQs

What does "jumping to conclusions" mean?

The phrase "jumping to conclusions" means forming an opinion or making a decision about something without having enough information or evidence.

How can I avoid "jumping to conclusions"?

To avoid "jumping to conclusions", gather all the facts before making a judgment, consider alternative explanations, and be open to changing your opinion as new information becomes available.

What's the difference between "rushing to conclusions" and "jumping to conclusions"?

While both phrases are similar, "rushing to conclusions" emphasizes the speed and haste of the decision, whereas "jumping to conclusions" highlights the lack of sufficient evidence.

When is it acceptable to "jump to conclusions"?

While generally discouraged, "jumping to conclusions" might be acceptable in situations demanding immediate action where a complete analysis isn't feasible, but it should be followed by a thorough review when time permits.