Sentence examples for judicial tests from inspiring English sources

Black took an absolutist approach to First Amendment jurisprudence, believing the first words of the Amendment that said "Congress shall make no law... ...... Black rejected the creation of judicial tests for free speech standards, such as the tests for "clear and present danger", "bad tendency", "gravity of the evil," "reasonableness," or "balancing".

Otherwise, we run a great risk that every election will result in judicial testing.

The first major judicial test of Bush v. Gore's legacy came in California in 2003.

C1 Business Digest C1 World Business W1 HOUSE & HOME F1-18 EDITORIAL A38-39 Editorials: The last act begins; a judicial test of press freedoms; provenance and curatorial conscience.

Whether UK rights were impugned by article 127 and the single market will be put to yet another judicial test; a dose of constitutionalism that serves at least to confirm the primacy of the rule of law.

But certainly, I believe, we must recognize that our principle of judicial scrutiny of legislative acts which raise important constitutional questions requires that the issue here presented -- the separation of state and church -- which the Founding Fathers regarded [p515] as fundamental to our constitutional system -- should be subjected to judicial testing.

The definitions of feasibility and "applicable laws of war" are similarly elastic: "Feasibility" includes whether there is "undue risk to U.S. personnel" (what constitutes "undue risk" is never explained), while, as Kevin Jon Heller has pointed out, the "laws of war" justification effectively ignores half of the judicial test it cites.

Jean-François Jean-François Jean-François Copér. Sarkozy's parthe the Union for a Popular Movement, desecretaryr. Strauss-Kahn's ordeal as "a particularly heavy judicial test," while notingeneralthat the U.M.P had always insisted that justice be allofed to run its course without prejudgMr.t.

The Court of Appeals, 307 F.2d 845, affirming the decision on similar grounds, relied on two letters (not before the District Court) written by State Department officers which it took as evidence that the Executive Branch had no objection to a judicial testing of the Cuban decree's validity.

Should a judicial test of this notion occur, it will at the least prove which of the current Supreme Court Justices are, or are not, true "originalists".

Chalfant noted this is the most rigorous judicial test and leaves the burden of proof to the DWP. Kelly Aviles, an attorney for the Union-Tribune, argued that the public has a right to the information in order to scrutinize the effectiveness and fairness of a ratepayer-funded program.