Sentence examples for judicial statute from inspiring English sources

The most crying abuses of the old judicial system were remedied by the judicial statute of 1864.

"That is why I will propose revising the judicial nomination statute".

And few would question the past success of law and economics in predicting the consequences of certain statutes, judicial opinions and policy proposals.

Although common-law systems make extensive use of statutes, judicial cases are regarded as the most important source of law, which gives judges an active role in developing rules.

Accounts of the role of interpretation in legal reasoning, then, differ regarding the following matters (n.b. several of the following points overlap to some extent): (1) What exactly is the original or object which is being interpreted in the case of law: the law as a whole?; certain aspects of legal practice?; statutes?; judicial decisions?; authoritative legal decisions?; legal texts?

So the legal system cannot fully predict how statutes, judicial thinking, regulators, and case precedent will apply to new technologies and business models.

Coke's meaning has been disputed over the years; some interpret his judgement as referring to judicial review of statutes to correct misunderstandings which would render them unfair, while others argue he meant that the common law courts have the power to completely strike down those statutes they deem to be repugnant.

Bush does not, of course, claim that any judicial act interpreting a statute of uncertain meaning is enough to displace the legislative provision and violate Article II; statutes require interpretation, which does not without more affect the legislative character of a statute within the meaning of the Constitution.

The federal statute governing judicial conflicts of interest covers only lower-court judges.

He urged the court to avoid a judicial rewriting of the statute.

Maybe I am missing it, but I don't see any proscription in the Constitution, federal statute or judicial ethics guidelines for nominees to discuss whether they believe a right to privacy exists in the Bill of Rights or if the death penalty is consistent with the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment (both settled Supreme Court precedents).