judicial review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "judicial review" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing the power of courts to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions. An example: "The Supreme Court's decision was based on the principles of judicial review." Alternative expressions include "court review" and "judicial oversight."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"That includes possible judicial review".

The New York Times

No judicial review.

The Guardian

That leaves judicial review.

The Guardian - Opinion

But judicial review could still be employed.

The New York Times

Judicial review of administration varies internationally.

Encyclopedia Britannica

(g)Judicial review.

Cornell University

Constitutional judicial review exists in several forms.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Cameron turns to judicial review.

The Guardian

They sought no judicial review.

The Guardian - Business

1211, provided for judicial review.

Cornell University

What judicial review is available?

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about the legal system, clarify the specific jurisdiction to which the "judicial review" applies, as practices vary internationally.

Common error

Don't use "judicial review" as a synonym for a general appeal. "Judicial review" specifically addresses the legality and constitutionality of government actions, while an appeal seeks to correct errors or injustices within a legal case.

Linguistic Context

"Judicial review" functions as a noun phrase that refers to a specific legal process and doctrine. Ludwig AI explains that it describes the power of courts to assess the validity of legislative and executive actions. Examples in Ludwig showcase its role in various contexts, from national security to administrative law.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

30%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "judicial review" is a noun phrase denoting the power of courts to examine the constitutionality of governmental actions. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage in formal contexts, particularly in legal, academic, and news domains. While the phrase is frequently used, it's essential to distinguish it from general appeals and to specify the relevant jurisdiction. Alternatives like "court oversight" and "legal scrutiny" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey. Remember to be precise in your legal writings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

review by the courts

Simple alteration that emphasizes the role of the courts

scrutiny by the judiciary

Rephrases the concept to highlight the role of the judiciary.

court oversight

Focuses on the supervisory aspect of courts, rather than the formal review process.

legal scrutiny

Emphasizes the careful and detailed examination from a legal perspective.

constitutional assessment

Highlights the evaluation of something against constitutional principles.

legislative examination

Focuses on the review of legislative actions.

executive branch review

Specifically refers to the review of actions taken by the executive branch.

administrative appeal

Implies a formal request for a review of an administrative decision.

legal due process

Highlights the procedural rights of individuals in legal proceedings.

constitutional checks

Emphasizes the limitations placed on governmental power by the constitution.

FAQs

What is the meaning of "judicial review"?

"Judicial review" is the power of courts to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution. It ensures checks and balances in the government.

How does "judicial review" differ from a regular appeal?

"Judicial review" examines the legality and constitutionality of governmental actions, whereas a regular appeal seeks to correct errors or injustices within a specific legal case. "Appeal" focuses on individual case outcomes, not the broader legality of government actions.

What are some alternatives to "judicial review"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "court oversight", "legal scrutiny", or "review by the courts".

What is the significance of "judicial review" in a democracy?

"Judicial review" is crucial for safeguarding constitutional rights and limiting governmental power. It ensures that laws and executive actions comply with the constitution, thus preventing potential abuses of authority.