"judicial instrument" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to an object or tool used by a court or judiciary system in order to carry out its duties. For example, "The legal team is using a judicial instrument to review the case."
The 14ft-high instrument of judicial murder – last used in 1977 for the execution of murderer Hamida Dhandoubi – was located, after a long search, gathering dust on a military base.
"Because the Judicial Conference is an instrument for the management of the lower federal courts, its committees have no mandate to prescribe rules or standards for any other body," Roberts wrote.
The primary reason for abuses of justice in China is that the judicial system is an instrument of party control, where political cadres directly and arbitrarily interfere in legal cases.
The group said it had shot Judge José Maria Lidón as he left his home in Bilbao because "the judicial system is another instrument of aggression with which to punish Basques and to absolve those who oppress the Basque homeland".
This book examines the European arrest warrant as a successful and effective instrument for judicial co-operation in criminal matters in the European Union.
Though he agreed that the applicants made the case that some voters could be irreparably harmed by losing access to their ballots, Stinson wrote in his decision, "It is problematic to change the rules for elections at the last minute through the blunt instrument of judicial intervention".
Musharraf's regime exploits the judicial system as yet another instrument of coercion and intimidation to consolidate its illegitimate power.
Foreclosure sale is the act of selling security either under the power of sale in the security instrument or through judicial proceedings.
Foreclosed is the completed act of selling security either under the power of sale in the security instrument or through judicial proceedings.
First, a central, hitherto underappreciated, doctrinal instrument for rationing judicial resources is a demand that most constitutional claimants demonstrate that an official violated an exceptionally clear, unambiguous constitutional rule that is, not only that the Constitution was violated, but that the violation evinced a demanding species of fault.
