judicial caning

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "judicial caning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions about legal punishments or historical practices involving corporal punishment administered by the judicial system. Example: "The controversial practice of judicial caning has sparked debates about human rights and legal reform in several countries."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Amnesty International is calling on Malaysia to halt the practice of judicial caning, a punishment the organization said amounts to torture and violates international law.

The New York Times

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Amnesty International is calling on Malaysia to halt the practice of judicial caning, a punishment the rights group says amounts to torture and violates international law.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Zimbabwe's constitutional court has banned the caning of juvenile convicts as a judicial punishment.

BBC

Judicial appointments!

The New York Times

There is judicial relief.

The New York Times

Compare judicial activism.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Mr. Nuon Chea, now a frail, bent man who walks with a cane and favors large dark glasses, has repeatedly expressed his personal innocence and his disdain for the slowly unfolding judicial process.

The New York Times

"Our judicial system worked.

The New York Times

Judicial torture was abandoned.

The New Yorker

A judicial dismemberment?

Independent

The judicial system?

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "judicial caning" in formal writing when referring to legally sanctioned caning as a form of punishment, particularly in contexts discussing international law or human rights reports.

Common error

Avoid using "judicial caning" interchangeably with general terms like "corporal punishment". "Judicial caning" specifically refers to caning administered as a result of a court decision, while corporal punishment can include non-judicial settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "judicial caning" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective 'judicial' modifies the noun 'caning'. It denotes a specific type of corporal punishment authorized by a court of law. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "judicial caning" is a grammatically correct term used to describe caning that is administered as a punishment by order of a court. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is valid in English writing. It is most frequently found in news and media contexts, often in discussions related to human rights and legal systems. Although the term is valid, it's important to be mindful of its sensitive nature due to its association with corporal punishment. While "judicial caning" is correct, related phrases like "court-ordered caning" or "legal caning" can offer slight variations in emphasis. As Ludwig demonstrates, understanding the term's context and connotations is crucial for its appropriate use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

court-ordered caning

Replaces the adjective "judicial" with "court-ordered" for greater clarity.

court-administered caning

Highlights the administration of the caning by the court system.

legal caning

Substitutes "judicial" with "legal", emphasizing the lawful aspect of the punishment.

legally approved caning

Stresses the legal approval aspect of the caning.

judicially sanctioned caning

Emphasizes the official approval of the caning by the judiciary.

corporal punishment by court order

Rephrases to highlight the method and the authority imposing it.

formally sanctioned caning

Emphasizes the formal or official approval of the caning.

official caning penalty

Rephrases the term as a caning penalty officially recognized by law.

caning as a legal penalty

Focuses on the role of caning within the legal framework.

caning under legal authority

Highlights that the caning is carried out with legal authorization.

FAQs

What does "judicial caning" refer to?

"Judicial caning" refers to the practice of administering caning as a form of punishment ordered by a court of law, typically for specific offenses.

Is "judicial caning" considered legal worldwide?

No, "judicial caning" is a controversial practice and is considered a violation of human rights by many international organizations. Its legality varies by country, and it is banned in many parts of the world.

What are some alternative terms for "judicial caning"?

Alternatives include "court-ordered caning", "legal caning", or "corporal punishment by court order", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Why is "judicial caning" often criticized?

"Judicial caning" is often criticized because it is viewed as a form of torture or cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, violating international human rights standards.