Sentence examples for judgment of relevance from inspiring English sources

The final selection of references was based on our judgment of relevance, completeness, and compatibility with recent clinical, pathological, and genetic criteria.

A succinct description that conveys the topic (study population, interventions), acronym (if any), and basic study design including the method of intervention allocation (eg, parallel group randomised trial; single-group trial)—will facilitate retrieval from literature or internet searches and rapid judgment of relevance.

Part of the difficulty is that to express such relatively fine-grained judgments of explanatory relevance (that it is linear momentum rather than chalk marks that matters) we need to talk about relationships between properties or magnitudes and it is not clear how to express such judgments in terms of facts about causal processes and interactions.

The judgment may also be of relevance to the current debate over whether there should be judicial or ministerial authorisation of interception warrants (which were not the subject of the Davis/Watson case, but which relate to the content of communications and may thus be considered more intrusive than the communications data at stake in that case).

Results revealed that activity in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) predicted both subsequent memory performance and judgments of self-relevance (Macrae et al. 2004).

In reality, however, the labels usually contain noise due to the difficulties of relevance judgments and several other reasons.

Thus, a rich variation of relevance judgments and substantial suggestions for reformulations were generated.

The objective of relevance judgments in IR tests is to get as close as possible to real-life situations so that test results would have real-life validity.

The very nature of the structured interview precludes the sorts of relevance judgments and frame shifting that cognitive research shows to be necessary in situations requiring complex pattern recognition, which is obviously the case in most psychiatric interviews.

In the medical domain, the contextual dependence of relevance judgments, classifications and analogies is even more important, as these are often based on uncertain information and may be dynamically reevaluated in the light of new information about the patients or about their diseases.

The court's decision to suspend the so-called safe harbour agreement is one of those rare beasts: a highly legalistic judgment of seemingly little public relevance whose ripples will touch – if not be felt – by everyone from the average British Facebook user to the American congressman.