Sentence examples for judgment of experience from inspiring English sources

The research goal of this study is to propose a conceptual model that explains the judgment of experience quality and the judgment criteria.

And finally, as we also saw in Section 3.1, the centrality thesis, the priority-of-the-proposition thesis, and the transcendental idealism thesis jointly entail the "transcendental truth" of judgment, which is that necessarily every well-generated judgment of experience is true and corresponds to an actual object of experience, that is, to an actual empirical fact.

So even if inner experience and outer experience are necessarily connected in general, the truth and objectivity of any particular judgment of experience, by Kant's own criteria for truth and objectivity, are consistent with the possibility that the particular object of experience corresponding to that judgment is nothing but very coherent dream or a hallucination.

Reflective judgment of experience could be either 'analytic' or 'synthetic'synthetic

In contrast, a synthetic judgment of experience recognises truth by virtue of conceptual meanings and external facts.

That very much impressed upon me, more than words, that I really didn't have the right to substitute my judgment for the judgment of experienced security personnel as to what was appropriate and what was not".

Merely subjective judgments of perception are parasitic on objectively valid judgments of experience, because self-consciousness requires that I place myself in an objective world and refer at least some of my representations to objects distinct from me.

So the Second Analogy's criterion of objectivity is ultimately insufficient to yield the empirical truth of judgments of experience, despite Kant's explicit claim that this criterion does yield both their objective validity and their empirical truth (A202/B247).

This in turn answers Hume's worry about the absence of necessary connection in phenomenal nature, by insisting that causal relations are imposed on sensory phenomena in temporal succession by cognizing subjects, via judgments of experience, and exist neither in themselves nor in the raw data of sensory experience.

But if this claim fails, then there can in principle be nomologically ill-behaved or "rogue" objects of human intuition that fall outside the scope of judgments of experience and thus also outside the categories, or at least outside the scope of the Second Analogy.

The findings showed that the subjective probability judgments of experience nurses and students were subject to systematic bias; either they overestimated or underestimated their judgmental abilities or knowledge of self judgment.