Sentence examples for judgment experiment from inspiring English sources

Li et al.'s study started with a list of 83 words that were related to 羞 xiu "shame/shyness," 耻 chi "disgrace," and 辱 ru "humiliation/shame" in the dictionary; the list was then expanded to 113 words and phrases by 10 native speakers; finally, the complete list of shame expressions were submitted to a judgment experiment for emotion sub-type with a separate group of 52 native speakers.

If reaction times are crucial to the acceptability judgment experiment, one could use an independent experimental platform (such as WebExp) and use AMT to recruit participants and direct them to the independent experimental platform.

We used 150 ms as the lower bound for response times in a simple reaction time experiment; 300 ms as the lower bound for response times in a basic choice reaction time experiment; and 600 ms for a more typical response time in a speeded categorization or judgment experiment.

Thus, the key to the success of emotion word judgment experiments is to provide sufficient control of the test materials and to ensure the reliability of the responses.

Small-scale judgment experiments build on this foundation by applying the minimum amount of extra effort needed to draw valid statistical inferences from the type of data most familiar to syntacticians, namely binary judgments involving very few speakers and sentences.

An alternative approach is to conduct judgment experiments with large groups of participants so as to obtain a normative perception of the emotion lexicon that better represents the comprehension of the general population.

This article reports a quantitative comparison of two identical acceptability judgment experiments, each with 176 participants (352 total): one conducted in the laboratory, and one conducted on AMT.

The quantitative comparison of these two large-scale samples suggests that Amazon Mechanical Turk is a viable alternative to laboratory-based acceptability judgment experiments.

The three weak phenomena presented in Fig.  4 have historically been difficult to detect with standard acceptability judgment experiments, likely because they are not caused by static properties of the final syntactic representation, but rather by dynamic properties of the way these representations are constructed during real-time sentence processing.

The experiment was carried out as a category-judgment experiment with 14 observers.

Forty three new participants took part for a payment of £3; alternating participants were assigned to the judgment task (Experiment 3A) and production task (Experiment 3B).