Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Although some still argue that assessment of excellence or quality by other researchers is the most appropriate method for judging research proposals [ 5], researchers are no longer unquestioningly accepted as the only group to decide on which research should be funded.
More recently, the "Science for the future" protesters objected to judging research by such impact.
It is expected that bibliometrics (using counts of journal articles and their citations) will be central to judging research quality in this system.
Members of the panels judging research (http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/panels/) have just been announced and are already meeting to discuss and decide the criteria by which they will assess research quality in their discipline.
"Fiddling in any fundamental way with the model of judging research proposals being reviewed by scientific experts in the relevant fields would place at risk the world-leading quality of this nation's scientific and engineering enterprises".
Our estimate of σ is not based on an analysis of biomedical research experts judging research projects close to their area of specialty.
Similar(53)
"Reviewers do not judge research papers with complete objectivity," said Dr. Habatwa Vincent Mweene, head of the physics department at the University of Zambia in Lusaka.
The use of bibliometrics - the number of research papers published and how often they are cited - could end up skewing the data used to judge research quality, an influential report warned today.
But one thing to keep in mind is that you can't judge research by who funds it.
The new oversight group, which he said will be part of the NIH's Council of Councils, will consist of independent experts from a "wide variety of perspectives" to judge research proposals and see whether they meet criteria spelled out in the report.
In fields with strong traditions of informing government policy through the publications in the grey literature (e.g. NGO and government reports), high impact publishing will seldom be the only factor that determines peer judged research influence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com