Sentence examples for judging improvement from inspiring English sources

Board of Education officials said the awards were nearly a year late because state and city standardized tests, the basis for judging improvement, changed last year, making it difficult to compare scores.

Because it is designed to reflect the depth of depression, it can monitor changes over time and provide an objective measure for judging improvement and the effectiveness or otherwise of treatment methods.

Response criteria according to the ACR allow judging improvement or change from baseline but not the actual state of disease activity.

Patients judged a daily pill superior to monthly injections (p<.01) and monthly injections superior to injections every three months (p<.01) for adherent patients and monthly injections superior to a daily pill for nonadherent patients (p=.01).Persons who self-identified as having schizophrenia judged improvement in positive symptoms as the most important treatment benefit.

To account for this, the group suggested a ≥ 30% improvement from baseline as an alternative threshold for judging individual improvement.

Improvement in all subjects was judged clinically (Improvement in cough, fever, appetite, wieight gain etc) radiographic evidence (resolution of lesion on repeat chest × ray after 3 months of standard anti-TB treatment).

Just last month, a report from the National Research Council suggested that it was too soon to conclude that mayoral control of the schools had led to major improvement in D.C. Nor did the report accept the widely touted idea that test scores alone are a good way to judge school improvement.

The famous John Radcliffe hospital, part of Oxford University hospitals NHS trust, was similarly judged "requires improvement" in May 2014 in light of a failure to learn from "never" events and problems in surgery, while senior doctors were said to be alienated from the board.

We judged an improvement of 3 points on this instrument to be clinically relevant, as this represents a change of wellbeing on one domain of quality of life from very poor to excellent.

[ 19, 22- 24] This leads to difficulty choosing a threshold by which to judge individual improvement; adopting minimal detectable change as a proxy for importance may not lead to meaningful results; too few participants achieve such large changes.

[ 19, 23- 27] In 2008, after reviewing a mix of literature on the instrument's MIC and minimal detectable change, a group of experts agreed five RMDQ points represented an appropriate threshold by which to judge individual improvement.