Figure 3 summarises risk of bias judgements across included studies and full details of review authors' judgements and support for judgements are provided for each study in 'Risk of bias' tables in Characteristics of included studies.
Conversely, if 150 summed points support the hypothesis, and 20 refute it, a judgement of "Support for hypothesis" may be more reasonable than "Inconsistent evidence" (Harrison 2010).
For example, if 20 summed points support a hypothesis, and 19 points refute it, a judgement of "Support for hypothesis" is unreasonable, and the evidence should be judged as inconsistent.
Professional engineering practice is mostly about exercising semi-intuitive professional judgement supported by back of the envelope calculations.
To decide which measures to use, expert judgement, supported by evidence where available, is often used.
Attacking Mr Corbyn, Mr Lewis said: "At the very least he has shown very poor judgement in expressing support for and failing to speak out against people who have engaged... in anti-Semitic rhetoric.
For each domain, the tool identifies potential sources of bias, prompts the reviewer to provide support for a judgement, and requests the review author's judgement concerning the level of bias (low, unclear or high risk of bias).
The remarkable agreement shown by male and female participants from four different countries in their overall rating patterns while viewing natural emotional behaviour offers strong support for the universality of emotion judgements.
Breitbart's hysterically partisan support for Ukip is no innocuous error of judgement.
Reviews of this nature provide robust support for flow management, and are more defensible than expert judgement-based approaches.
