judged to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "judged to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing an evaluation or assessment of something, often followed by an adjective or a clause that describes the judgment. Example: "The proposal was judged to be insufficient for the project's needs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mega-mergers are judged to have failed.

The Economist

A few were judged to be fakes.

The New York Times

Aich's salary was judged to be exorbitant.

The Guardian

Four samples were judged to be laced with anthrax spores.

The New York Times

They are judged to be not a team player".

The Guardian

For a long time it was judged to be inferior.

The Guardian - Books

The champagne truffle was judged to be lacking in booze.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The protocol is widely judged to have worked well.

The New York Times - Science

The latter was judged to sound just as sweet.

The Guardian

But the benefits were judged to outweigh that risk.

The New York Times

Suspect Farage will be judged to have won that.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "judged to" to express an evaluation or assessment based on specific criteria or evidence. It's often used in formal writing to convey a sense of objectivity.

Common error

Avoid using "judge" as a direct synonym for "judged to" in passive constructions. "Judge" typically requires an active subject (e.g., "The committee judged the proposal"), while "judged to" is part of a passive construction (e.g., "The proposal was judged to be insufficient").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "judged to" functions primarily as part of a passive construction, indicating that something has been evaluated or assessed. Ludwig AI confirms this, showing its prevalence in contexts where an objective assessment is required. It often precedes an adjective or a clause describing the judgment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "judged to" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase, commonly used to express evaluations and assessments in a variety of contexts. As Ludwig AI indicates, its strength lies in its ability to convey objectivity and formality. Its frequent presence in News & Media and Science, suggests its adaptability across both formal and neutral registers. When writing, remember that while the phrase is typically proper, alternative phrases like "deemed to be" or "considered to be" can provide subtle differences in meaning. Using "judged to" effectively means being aware of its function as part of a passive construction and avoiding direct substitutions that alter the sentence's intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deemed to be

Uses "deemed" instead of "judged", implying a formal assessment or decision.

considered to be

Replaces "judged" with "considered", suggesting a more general evaluation or opinion.

regarded as

Emphasizes the reputation or standing of something as perceived by others.

believed to be

Indicates a belief or opinion, rather than a formal judgment.

thought to be

Similar to "believed to be", but often implies a more casual or informal assessment.

found to be

Suggests a discovery or determination based on evidence or investigation.

determined to be

Implies a formal or official decision-making process.

estimated to be

Focuses on a quantitative assessment or approximation.

assessed as

Highlights the evaluation aspect, often in a professional or technical context.

concluded to be

Emphasizes the finality of the evaluation, typically after a period of investigation or deliberation.

FAQs

How can I use "judged to" in a sentence?

Use "judged to" when you want to express an evaluation or assessment of something based on certain criteria. For example, "The evidence was "judged to be" insufficient for a conviction".

What are some alternatives to "judged to"?

Alternatives include "deemed to be", "considered to be", or "regarded as". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "judged to be" grammatically correct?

Yes, "judged to be" is grammatically correct. It's a passive construction used to express an evaluation or assessment. For example, "The performance was "judged to be" outstanding".

What's the difference between "judged by" and "judged to"?

"Judged by" implies a comparison against a standard or criteria (e.g., "He was judged by his actions"). "Judged to" expresses an evaluation or assessment of something (e.g., "The plan was "judged to be" feasible").