judge at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "judge at" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a position or role in a specific context, such as a competition or legal setting, but it requires additional context to be usable. Example: "As a judge at the local talent show, I had the difficult task of evaluating the performances."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

You judge at mtvU.com.

The New York Times

A year later he was appointed judge at Mannheim.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"I haven't troubled the judge at all.

The Guardian - Sport

Judge at the European court of justice.

The Guardian

"It's difficult for the referees to judge at that speed".

Independent

Robert Triozzi, a judge at the time, heard the case.

The New York Times

She will officiate as a judge at the Flower Show.

The New Yorker

The judge at their trial warned against this tendency.

Independent

His father was a city court judge at 28.

The New York Times

"I do not envy this judge at all".

The New York Times

I'm a judge at half nine you see".

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For actions, use “to judge”, omitting “at”.

Common error

Avoid using "at" after "judge" when referring to a role or position. This preposition is often unnecessary and can make the sentence grammatically awkward. Instead, opt for "judge in" or "judge for" to maintain clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "judge at" typically functions as part of a longer phrase, often indicating someone's role or position in a specific event or context. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and should be used with caution.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Wiki

13%

Science

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "judge at" appears frequently in various sources, especially in News & Media, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically questionable. It's primarily used to describe someone's role or function in a specific event or setting. For improved clarity and correctness, it's recommended to use alternatives like ""judge in"", ""judge for"", or more formal phrases like "preside over". While its usage is widespread, particularly in certain contexts, being mindful of the grammatical ambiguity can enhance the precision and professionalism of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

serve as judge for

More explicitly states the role and purpose of the individual as a judge.

preside over

Replaces "judge at" with a verb phrase indicating authority and control, typically used in formal settings like court or meetings.

adjudicate in

This alternative focuses on the act of making a formal judgment or decision.

rule on

Specifies the act of making an official decision or giving a judgment on a specific issue.

officiate at

Emphasizes the formal and ceremonial aspects of presiding, often used in contexts like weddings or competitions.

give a verdict on

Highlights the finality and decisiveness of the judgment, often used in legal contexts.

act as arbiter in

Highlights the role of a neutral third party resolving disputes, focusing on fairness and impartiality.

evaluate

Focuses on assessing or determining the value or quality of something. Omits the positional "at".

make a determination about

This option emphasizes the process of reaching a conclusion after careful consideration.

assess

Similar to evaluate, but emphasizes the process of gathering information to make a judgment.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "judge" in a sentence?

Use "judge in" or "judge for" to indicate a role, such as "He is a "judge in" the competition" or "She will "judge for" the flower show". Alternatively, use “to judge” for actions.

Is "judge at" grammatically correct?

No, "judge at" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The more appropriate options are ""judge in"" or ""judge for"" when referring to a role or position.

What are some alternatives to saying "judge at"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "preside over", "serve as judge for", or simply "evaluate".

Which is correct: "judge at," "judge in," or "judge for"?

""judge in"" and ""judge for"" are grammatically preferred over "judge at" when specifying a context or event. “To judge” is used with no preposition when referring to the action.