Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We studied the accuracy of the reporting of statistical results in a random selection of high- and low-impact psychology journals (Study 1), and in a fully random sample of recent psychology articles, in which the researchers had employed NHST (Study 2).
Similar(58)
Only 16% of the journals studied required authors to use STARD.
Additionally, as shown in multiple peer reviewed journals, studies reveal that a short term detox of opioid patients as done in residential treatment facilities increases morbidity and mortality by 92%.
"Animal" and "Plant" refer to journals studying animals and plant but not specifically their ecology (for example Nematology and Plant Physiology).
Finally, the same algorithm was applied to the four journals studied and the comparisons between journals are therefore considered reliable.
The proportion of journals studied was very low in relation to the total number of journals published.
In our study, we observed a large variation in the number of SDM publications across the 15 journals studied.
Out of the 28 journals studied in this analysis, only one of the journals (Ceylon Medical Journal) was indexed in PubMed and carried an impact factor.
For the journals studied, peer reviewers could choose one of six recommendations suggested in the reviewer form, or choose not to provide recommendation.
Only "neurology" and "gastroenterology" displayed a consistent pattern, with a constant decrease in its relative weight in the four journals studied.
The submission of consent forms was required by 30% (154) of the journals studied, and 10% (50) provided their own consent forms for authors to use.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com