Academic disputes usually flare out in the safety of obscure journals, raising no more than a few tempers, if not voices.
By linking peer review and publication date, critics say, editors have increased the news value of their journals, a step that has slowed the free flow of information and helped some journals raise subscriptions, advertisement rates and profits.
Second, the sparseness of action-oriented research in nutrition journals raises the question: Does it matter?
The observed decline of RCTs published in German language general health care journals raises the question whether the number of trials is declining or whether trials nowadays are more frequently not published or published elsewhere.
However, these OA journals raise the second key challenge to equitable access to research and knowledge sharing in Africa: to offset the fact that OA journals have no subscription costs, they shift this burden to authors, charging high publishing fees ranging from US$1000 to US$2500 per publication [ 1, 21].
Investor skittishness about ad companies the last few months grew after an article in The Wall Street Journal raised questions about the accounting at Omnicom.
But in 2015, an investigation by the Wall Street Journal raised concerns about the validity of the company's testing technology.
An opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal raised eyebrows among some observers, like Robin Wigglesworth, a Financial Times correspondent, because it gave prominence to a frequently heard accusation by the government of an Iranian hand manipulating Bahrain's Shiite protest movement.
According to the tabloid they are dangerous, incovenient for city workers and have been hit by glitches – but the Wall Street Journal raised the bar over the weekend when editorial board member Dorothy Rabinowitz launched a tirade against the scheme in a video interview on the newspaper's website.
