Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The 355 qualitative studies appeared in 48 journals (mean 7.4 articles per journal, range 1 to 86).
A study that compared PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar has found that PubMed remains an important resource for clinicians and researchers, while Scopus covers a wider journal range and offers the capability for citation analysis [ 4, 26- 28].
A study that compared Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge found that PubMed is considered an important resource for clinicians and researchers, while Scopus offers the capability for citation analysis and covers a wider journal range [ 28, 45- 47].
Similar(57)
In our examination of the journals in which papers from the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks were published, we found the 419 papers were published in 114 different journals, with the number of publications per journal ranging from 57 to 1.
The absolute number of SDM publications by journal ranged from 2 to 273 over 16 years.
The number of articles of any type about any DS in each journal ranged from four to 61 (Table 2).
The number of SDM publications relative to the total number of publications by journal ranged from 0.09% in The Lancet to 4.99% in Journal of General Internal Medicine.
The percentage of the missing items in relation to total relevant items for a particular journal ranged from 3.8%too 63.8%, with a median of 27.3% (IQR 12.8 35.3%).
The first papers published in CPT PSP reflect the broad scope of the journal, ranging from physiologically based pharmacokinetics/Systems Pharmacology to population-based PKPD modeling of biomarkers and clinical outcomes.
The article processing charges (APCs) charged by open-access journals range from just a few hundred dollars to more than $3000.
However, Scopus database covers a wider journals range and sustains as one of the best available database in tracking and analyzing citations and in comparing citations of different research teams and institutions (De Granda-Orivetet al. 2011).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com