jointly recognized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "jointly recognized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to multiple parties or entities that are acknowledged together for a specific achievement or contribution. Example: "The scientists were jointly recognized for their groundbreaking research in renewable energy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

(Atiyah and Singer were jointly recognized for this work with the 2004 Abel Prize).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

He met up with Mr. Redden, and they jointly recognized the opportunity for applying computer vision and machine learning to agriculture.

The New York Times - Science

In 1985, Frank Prescod and his longtime friend and business partner, Stanley Armstrong, were jointly recognized by the Black Retail Action Group for their extraordinary achievements.

The New York Times

For example, jointly recognized rules on car safety or a single trans-Atlantic test for new drugs would cut costs for manufacturers and so should lower prices for consumers.

The New York Times

The Off-Broadway and Original Broadway productions were jointly recognized with Drama League Award nominations for Outstanding Production of a Broadway or Off-Broadway Play and with Distinguished Performance Award nominations for both Nielsen and Pierce; the play won for Outstanding Production of a Broadway or Off-Broadway Play.

Wikipedia

Today, alliances not only share revenue, routes and marketing, but also jointly recognize a passenger's frequent flier status.

The New York Times

Upon the TG model, we introduce a Preferential Random Walk (PRW) method to jointly recognize developmental stage and annotate anatomical terms by utilizing the interrelations between two tasks.

Bioinformatics

We've worked jointly with influential farmers like Tim Smith, who was recognized for his leadership in sustainable agriculture by being selected as a 2015 Champion for Change.

Huffington Post

Three Lions were recognized for longtime membership.

Los Angeles Times

Nathalie and Richard Woodbury were recognized jointly and severally for their significant services for the town and their professional societies.

The New York Times

Dr. Schlossman, recognized worldwide for jointly describing the Posner Schlossman syndrome, was a respected clinician, teacher and mentor and member of our staff for more than 50 years.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Using the phrase "jointly recognized for" is optimal when emphasizing the shared nature of an accomplishment or attribute among two or more parties.

Common error

Avoid using "jointly recognized for" when the recognition is not explicitly shared or collaborative. If individuals receive separate awards for related achievements, avoid implying a joint recognition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "jointly recognized for" serves as a descriptor, indicating that two or more entities are being acknowledged together for a specific achievement or quality. It modifies a noun phrase, providing information about the nature of the recognition.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "jointly recognized for" is a descriptor used to indicate shared acknowledgement of an accomplishment or attribute. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and suitable for use in various contexts, especially when highlighting collaboration or shared achievement. While Ludwig examples show its presence across news, science, and encyclopedic sources, remember to clearly specify the source of the recognition to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "collectively acknowledged for" or "mutually recognized for" can provide nuanced emphasis depending on your intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collectively acknowledged for

Emphasizes the group aspect of recognition more strongly than "jointly recognized for".

mutually recognized for

Highlights reciprocal recognition between entities.

recognized in collaboration for

Specifically points out the collaborative nature of the achievement leading to recognition.

honored together for

Focuses on the honor or award aspect of the recognition.

credited jointly with

Highlights the contribution or accomplishment for which recognition is given.

awarded jointly for

Similar to 'honored together for' but emphasizing the bestowal of an award.

lauded together for

Emphasizes praise and commendation received jointly.

celebrated jointly for

Highlights the act of celebrating shared recognition.

distinguished jointly for

Focuses on the unique distinction achieved through collaboration.

acclaimed collaboratively for

Stresses public praise and acknowledgement for collaborative efforts.

FAQs

How can I use "jointly recognized for" in a sentence?

You can use "jointly recognized for" to describe situations where two or more entities are acknowledged together for a specific achievement. For example: "The researchers were jointly recognized for their contributions to the field".

What are some alternatives to "jointly recognized for"?

Alternatives include "collectively acknowledged for", "mutually recognized for", or "honored together for", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "jointly recognized by" instead of "jointly recognized for"?

Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Jointly recognized by" emphasizes the source of the recognition, while "jointly recognized for" emphasizes the reason or achievement that led to the recognition. The choice depends on what you want to emphasize.

What is the difference between "jointly recognized for" and "widely recognized for"?

"Jointly recognized for" implies that two or more entities are being acknowledged together, while "widely recognized for" implies that something is generally acknowledged by many people or organizations. The former focuses on the shared recognition, and the latter on the breadth of recognition.