Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In this paper, the comparative study of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris from the implanted artificial joint and hip joint tester was performed on their size distribution, shape, 3-D feature, and thickness.
Similar(58)
The order of measurement with regards to both joint measurement and tester, was randomised to ensure a balanced experimental design.
Previous research designed a tester to examine the joint laxity of the TMC joint during lateral pinch, and the results showed that ligament reconstruction and osteotomy significantly affected this [ 18].
The first investigated both inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of knee joint measurements in supine, sitting and standing using a flexible electrogoniometer.
The second study evaluated inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of knee joint angle measurements in standing and after walking 10 metres in 20 healthy adults, using an enhanced measurement protocol with a more detailed electrogoniometer attachment procedure.
The intra-tester reliability phase of the study was conducted by one tester (PP) measuring knee joint angles on two occasions on the same participants on the same day.
Jakobsen et al. (2010) showed substantial inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of the knee joint ROM measurement in patients with TKA [ 22].
The ICCs[2,10] for inter-tester reliability of knee joint measurements ranged from 0.57 to 0.80 across three testing positions with the error of measurement between testers ranging from 1.48° to 3.55° (Table 1).
The current investigation examined the inter- and intra-tester reliability of knee joint angle measurements using a flexible Penny and Giles Biometric® electrogoniometer.
Limits of agreement for the means and the standard deviation of the knee joint angle measurements measured by two testers ranged from -6.0° to 4.9° with a mean difference less than 0.6°.
Knee joint pain was assessed using an incapacitance tester.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com