Sentence examples for joint preferences from inspiring English sources

With simulations alone, however, it is impossible to determine if this is due to a decrease in competitive costs or an increase in indirect selection driven by stronger joint preferences by females with both preferences for males with both traits.

Although multiple preferences do not lead to direct (i.e. natural) selection for preference evolution, their presence is likely to increase the strength of indirect selection on preference and trait evolution, creating strong joint preferences in females with both preferences for males with both traits; this leads to a decrease in the initial preference strength required for evolution.

The method also allows for trade-off decision-making and joint preference articulation for various conservation actions, and thus provides more realistic decision situations than other survey methods can achieve.

Although the group format was associated with enhanced social support for individuals [ 40], the joint preference for this format was mainly related to demographic and geographic conditions.

The means that you become honest about topics such as expectations for when and where you'll hang out, the frequency at which you'll spend time with each other, the types of activities you guys want to do together, sexual preferences, joint adventures and activities, and your true thoughts and feelings.

Unmeasured confounding, such as bone quality, the anatomy of the hip joint, and the preferences of patient and surgeon would certainly also influence the results, but these considerations could not be addressed in our study.

18 Coefficients will be adjusted for scale using the Swait and Louviere 19 approach allowing for scale adjusted comparison and the preference data from the subgroups will be tested to determine whether it can be pooled to estimate a joint model of preferences.

Future studies could use modeling strategies for example with joint distributions of preference parameters such that the independency assumption can be relaxed.

A joint evolution of preference and performance is not always observed, due to the need for coupling based on pleiotropy or by linkage disequilibrium between both traits (Futuyma and Moreno 1988; Forister et al. 2007).

It is concluded that the model offers new insights in location preferences for joint activities that should be taken into account in spatial choice models and accessibility analysis.

This suggests that each spouse brings an inclination toward certain activities to the marriage that reflects compatible preferences for joint consumption of household public goods.