Sentence examples for job outcome from inspiring English sources

If that person finds a job and manages to work, either continuously or in short-term chunks, for a total of 26 weeks, the company gets a "job outcome fee" of £1,200.

The same recruiter placed a jobseeker into a job at Blue Arrow, the recruitment company, but auditors reported that Blue Arrow was under the impression they were signing a reference form, not a form that would potentially claim a "job outcome" from the government.

The Department of Work and Pensions said: "The period covered by this data makes it virtually impossible for any provider to have built up a significant number of job outcome payments, most of which are only payable after someone has found a job and stayed in it for six months".

The same named recruiter had claimed a job outcome for a jobseeker at the retailer Peacocks where the employer had signed the form presented to her but was apparently under the impression that this was to confirm a placement, not to confirm a permanent job.

A job at a painting and decorating company had not been filled by an A4e client, but a form had been completed and a claim from government had been submitted; in a cleaning company, a form that said the recruit was to work for fewer than 16 hours had been replaced with another; and in another, the forms had not been completed before being claimed as a positive job outcome.

Providers are paid a "start fee" for each participant, a "completion fee" (paid at two rates - 30% for a participant who spends between 12 and 20 weeks on a placement and 100% for between 21 and 26 weeks) and, if appropriate, a "job outcome fee" (paid at the point when a participant has been off benefits and in work for 26 out of 30 weeks).

But we are focusing too narrowly on job outcomes.

In 14% of cases – or 32 successful job outcomes – auditors were unable to complete visits.

Auditors were asked in July 2009 to examine a sample of job outcomes claimed from across A4e's contracts.

There were seven cases where auditors believed that the job outcomes posed "reputation risk" if the details were ever exposed to the public.

"The proposed increased focus on rewarding job outcomes is positive a step, but some of the outcome payments – such as a payment at four weeks" employment – don't match up with what we know about sustainable employment outcomes.